Showing posts with label Libyan War. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Libyan War. Show all posts

Thursday, July 7, 2011

Obama would rather cut Social Security and Medicare than Wars and Empire

By: Andrew Steele
Opednews.com
July 7, 2011 at 11:14:50


Obama's a socialist? Nope-- just another run-of-the-mill corporatist. Nothing better exemplifies this than the latest news coming out about the the debt talks between the President and the congressional leaders of the fake right.

From the Washington Post:

"President Obama is pressing congressional leaders to consider a far-reaching debt-reduction plan that would force Democrats to accept major changes to Social Security and Medicare in exchange for Republican support for fresh tax revenue...As part of his pitch, Obama is proposing significant reductions in Medicare spending and for the first time is offering to tackle the rising cost of Social Security, according to people in both parties with knowledge of the proposal."

Regardless of one's beliefs about the constitutionality of these programs, both sides of the debate should be quick to notice the priorities of the President, and his so called opposition, turning to programs so many Americans have already paid into and are depending on instead of first looking overseas at the corporate/U.S. military world empire that is bankrupting us all.

According to a report released last month by Brown University, the The United States will have spent a total of $3.7 trillion on the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan by the time that they're over (the word "over" being loosely defined in 21st Century Amerika ). This isn't counting the war in Libya (oh, I forgot that's not a war, according to Obama) or the bases the United States maintains in nations like Germany where hostilities ended so long ago that most of the people who participated in them have either died or are living on Social Security.

Even Libertarian minded presidential candidate Ron Paul-- who is often the subject of attacks by pundits trying to imply that Social Security and Medicare would abruptly end the minute he was sworn into office-- has advocated changing foreign policy and dramatically cutting defense spending before touching Social Security and Medicare, allowing people to get what they have already paid for and not be cheated any further by their corrupt government.

Indeed, if real cuts are going to be made, they first need to be made in the areas of the budget that have not only outlived their usefulness, but are also causing the country more harm than good. Though Obama has tried to give us the impression that the wars that started under Bush are ending, his plans for withdrawal from these wars are simply diversionary games designed to keep the U.S. military as an occupying force within the targeted nations for as long as possible. (Under Obama, the U.S. has recently proposed keeping troops in Iraq past the withdrawal deadline at the end of this year.)

On top of that, like Bush's wars, Obama's new war in Libya has absolutely nothing to do with the security of the United States and certainly doesn't deserve in any way to be further from the cutting board than the programs at home he pretends to champion.

To those who believe in socialism and those who don't, look upon your president and those around him and see what they really are-- well dressed parasites feeding off your tax dollars along with their cronies, sucking out the blood of the country in order to spread a disease of empire across the globe. They are a bigger threat to the wealth and safety of ordinary, well-meaning Americans than ordinary Americans could ever be to each other.

Across the country Americans on all sides of the spectrum need to speak as one and tell the President in no uncertain terms that the promised retirement and health funds of hard working people are not the fuel of tanks and fighter jets, and certainly aren't the missiles of predator drones.

Monday, June 27, 2011

Webster Tarpley Reporting from Tripoli

Alex Jones today interviewed Dr. Webster Tarpley who has been in Libya for the past several days. Tarpley is now in Tripoli documenting the devastation being brought about by NATO bombing sorties.

Tarpley contends that several million Libyans are strongly in support of Moamar Goddafi who has armed them with AK-47's, rocket propelled grenade launchers and other munitions. Gaddafi's millions of supporters according to Tarpley will fight to repel any attempt on the part of NATO to introduce ground troops.
________________________________________________

Britain Looks at Sending Libyan Occupation Force

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
June 27, 2011

Britain is preparing to send troops to Libya after Col. Gaddafi is killed or removed, the Mirror reports today. British PM Cameron will have no other options, according to an unnamed source in the government.



Sending ground troops to Libya would turn country into hell, experts warn.

“I always find myself getting to my knees and praying to God that we don’t bomb Gaddafi that night because what the f— would we do next?” said the source. “We may simply have to, whatever the international reaction. But we would have to make it absolutely clear there was a strict timetable, say six weeks.”

On Sunday, British Defense Secretary Liam Fox said nobody in the government said the campaign against Gaddafi would be “short and sharp.” On June 21, PM Cameron said Britain will continue its military campaign in Libya as long as needed.

“I’m absolutely confident that we can keep this pressure up, we can maintain this mission for as long as is necessary,” Cameron told a news conference, according to Reuters.

Obama also said the military attack on Libya would last as long as the NATO and the United States deemed necessary. During a speech at Westminster Hall on May 26, Obama described the operation in Libya as an example of how the alliance between the U.K. and the U.S. remains the “greatest catalyst for global action.”

In March, Obama said the “kinetic action” in Libya would last “days, not weeks.” June 19 marked 90 days the U.S. has been involved in an attempt to impose regime change on the country. So far, the U.S. has spent more than $750 million on the effort.

In April, Britain sent senior military officers to advise the opposition, including elements of al-Qaeda. In May, it was reported that former British SAS soldiers and other western employees of private security companies were on the ground in Libya directing the effort against Gaddafi.

Early in the manufactured conflict, the U.S. sent Special Forces to Libya along with British and French “defense advisers.” In a special report published by the Pakistan Observer, a Libyan diplomat in the region said “the three Western states have landed their ‘special forces troops in Cyrinacia and are now setting up their bases and training centers’ to reinforce the rebel forces who are resisting pro-Qaddafi forces in several adjoining areas.”